Is It Illegal to Record Someone Without Their Permission?

Is It Illegal to Record Someone Without Their Permission Cover Image

Is it illegal to record someone without their permission? In the United States, sometimes. Federal law generally allows recording when at least one party to the conversation consents, but individual states can impose stricter rules. Some require everyone's consent, while others apply different rules to phone calls, electronic communications, and in-person conversations.

‍

Most states broadly follow one-party consent rules. A smaller group primarily requires all-party consent, commonly called two-party consent, and several states use mixed rules.

‍

The European Union works differently. Rather than dividing countries into one-party and two-party jurisdictions, the GDPR treats identifiable recordings as personal data processing. Organizations need an appropriate lawful basis and must meet transparency, security, retention, and other data-protection requirements.

‍

Important: This article provides general information about recording and privacy laws. It is not legal advice. Laws change, exceptions are fact-specific, and courts may interpret statutes differently. For specific legal questions, consult a qualified attorney in the relevant jurisdiction.

What does federal law say about recording conversations?

Under 18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(d), you can generally record a conversation if you're part of it or if at least one participant has given prior consent, as long as the recording is not being made for a criminal or wrongful purpose.

‍

In other words, under federal law, recording a conversation is generally allowed when at least one party agrees to it. If you're part of the conversation, your own consent is usually enough under the federal Wiretap Act and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act.

‍

The same can apply if you're not personally part of the conversation but at least one person involved has given prior consent to the recording.

‍

However, federal law is only the starting point. State law can set stricter rules, which is why it matters whether you're in a one-party consent state, an all-party consent state, or a state where the requirements depend on the type of conversation being recorded.

‍

Getting this wrong can have serious consequences. Depending on the law that applies, an illegal recording can lead to criminal penalties, civil penalties, or a lawsuit seeking civil damages.

‍

What are one-party consent states?

A one-party consent state generally lets you record a conversation as long as at least one participant agrees to it.

‍

If you're part of the conversation, that participant can be you. In other words, your own consent is usually enough, so you do not necessarily need the other person's consent before recording a call or meeting.

‍

For example, in a one-party state, you may be able to record a business call you're participating in even if the other people on the call have not given explicit permission.

‍

That does not mean you can record any conversation you want. If you're not one of the parties involved, secretly recording a private conversation may still violate federal or state wiretapping laws.

‍

The setting matters too. Some laws focus specifically on private or confidential conversations, so whether someone had a reasonable expectation of privacy can affect how the rule applies.

What are two-party consent states?

A two-party consent state generally requires everyone involved in a private conversation to agree before it is recorded.

‍

You will also see these referred to as all-party consent states, which is technically more accurate. If five people are on a call, for example, the rule is not that only two of them need to agree. It applies to all relevant participants.

‍

That makes secretly recording meetings or calls much riskier in these states. Recording without everyone's consent can lead to criminal charges, a civil lawsuit, or other legal consequences, depending on the law that applies.

‍

There are also a few states that do not fit neatly into a one-party or two-party category. Connecticut, Michigan, Nevada, and Oregon, for example, can apply different rules depending on whether the conversation happens over the phone, electronically, or in person.

‍

Which states are one-party and two-party consent states?

The following table provides a quick reference for all 50 states plus Washington, D.C.

Interactive map

Recording consent laws by US state

Hover over or click a state to see its general consent rule.

    General information only, not legal advice. Federal law (18 U.S.C. § 2511) sets a one-party baseline; when people join from different states, following the strictest rule is the safest option.

    State/jurisdiction General consent rule Important qualification Source
    Alabama One-party Alabama generally allows recording when at least one person involved has consented. Recording other people's conversations without consent can still count as eavesdropping. Ala. Code § 13A-11-31
    Alaska One-party Alaska generally requires consent from at least one person in the conversation before an oral conversation is recorded. Alaska Stat. § 42.20.310
    Arizona One-party Arizona generally allows you to record if you're part of the conversation or have consent from someone who is. Ariz. Rev. Stat. §§ 13-3005, 13-3012
    Arkansas One-party Arkansas generally allows recording when you're part of the conversation or one participant has given prior consent. Ark. Code § 5-60-120
    California All-party for confidential communications California's rules focus on confidential conversations, especially where people reasonably expect they are not being recorded or overheard. Cal. Penal Code § 632
    Colorado One-party Colorado has separate rules covering wire, oral, and electronic communications. Colorado Revised Statutes
    Connecticut Mixed Connecticut has different rules for different situations. Private phone calls may require everyone's consent, a recorded notice, or a recurring warning tone, and civil and criminal rules are not identical. Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-570d
    Delaware Complex / generally treated as all-party Delaware's rules are more complicated than a simple one-party or all-party label because different privacy and interception laws can apply. Del. Code tit. 11, ch. 24
    Florida All-party Florida generally requires all-party consent for covered wire, oral, and electronic communications, although exceptions exist. Fla. Stat. § 934.03
    Georgia Generally one-party Georgia distinguishes between private conversations and certain activities that take place in private settings. Official Georgia Code portal
    Hawaii Generally one-party Hawaii generally follows one-party consent, but extra restrictions can apply in highly private settings or when certain recording devices are used. Hawaii Revised Statutes
    Idaho One-party Idaho generally allows recording when at least one participant has consented. Idaho Code, Title 18
    Illinois All-party for private conversations Illinois requires extra care with private conversations. Secretly recording a private conversation or private electronic communication can violate state law. 720 ILCS 5/14-2
    Indiana Federal one-party rule generally applies Indiana generally follows the federal one-party approach for recordings that are permitted under federal law. Ind. Code § 35-33.5-5-5
    Iowa One-party Iowa generally allows recording when one participant has given prior consent. Iowa Code § 808B.2
    Kansas One-party Kansas generally requires consent from the sender or receiver of a private communication and also protects conversations that take place in private settings. Kan. Stat. § 21-6101
    Kentucky One-party in participant-recording context Kentucky's rules depend on how its eavesdropping law and related definitions apply to the situation. Ky. Rev. Stat. § 526.020
    Louisiana One-party Louisiana generally allows recording when you're part of the conversation or one participant has given prior consent. La. Rev. Stat. § 15:1303
    Maine Generally one-party Maine has separate rules for oral and wire communications, with several exceptions depending on the situation. Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 15, § 710
    Maryland All-party Maryland generally requires consent from everyone involved in a covered conversation unless an exception applies. Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 10-402
    Massachusetts All-party for secret recording Massachusetts has strict rules around secret audio recording, so undisclosed recording carries a higher legal risk. Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 272, § 99
    Michigan Mixed Michigan is more nuanced. Its statute focuses on eavesdropping on the private conversations of others, while court decisions affect how participant recording is treated. Michigan Legislature, MCL 750.539c
    Minnesota One-party Minnesota generally allows recording when you're part of the conversation or have consent from one participant. Minn. Stat. § 626A.02
    Mississippi One-party Mississippi generally allows recording when one participant has given prior consent. Mississippi Code portal
    Missouri One-party for covered wire communications Missouri generally allows participant recording or recording with one party's consent, but oral conversations can raise separate questions. Mo. Rev. Stat. § 542.402
    Montana All-party knowledge Montana generally requires everyone involved to know that a conversation is being recorded, subject to limited exceptions. Mont. Code § 45-8-213
    Nebraska One-party Nebraska generally allows recording when you're part of the conversation or one participant has consented. Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 86-290 to 86-295
    Nevada Mixed Nevada uses different rules for private in-person conversations and phone calls, so the type of communication matters. NRS §§ 200.620, 200.650
    New Hampshire All-party New Hampshire generally requires consent from everyone involved in covered phone, electronic, and oral conversations unless an exception applies. N.H. Rev. Stat. § 570-A:2
    New Jersey One-party New Jersey generally allows recording when you're part of the conversation or one participant has given prior consent. N.J. Stat. § 2A:156A-4
    New Mexico One-party New Mexico generally follows a one-party consent approach for covered communications. New Mexico Statutes portal
    New York One-party New York generally allows participants to record their own conversations, while separate laws prohibit unlawful wiretapping and eavesdropping. N.Y. Penal Law art. 250
    North Carolina One-party North Carolina generally allows recording as long as at least one participant has consented. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-287
    North Dakota One-party North Dakota generally follows a one-party approach, but the eavesdropping rules should be read together with the exceptions in the same law. North Dakota Century Code
    Ohio One-party Ohio generally allows participant recording and other one-party-consent situations under statutory exceptions. Ohio Rev. Code § 2933.52
    Oklahoma One-party Oklahoma generally allows recording when one participant has consented. Oklahoma Statutes portal
    Oregon Mixed Oregon uses different rules depending on the format. Phone and electronic communications generally require consent from at least one participant, while in-person conversations usually require participants to be informed. Or. Rev. Stat. § 165.540
    Pennsylvania All-party Pennsylvania generally requires consent from all parties unless a specific exception applies. 18 Pa.C.S. §§ 5703-5704
    Rhode Island One-party Rhode Island generally allows recording when you're part of the conversation or have consent from one participant. Rhode Island General Laws
    South Carolina One-party South Carolina generally allows recording when you're part of the conversation or one participant has given prior consent. S.C. Code § 17-30-30
    South Dakota One-party South Dakota generally allows a sender, receiver, or participant to record in situations covered by the state's exceptions. S.D. Codified Laws § 23A-35A-20
    Tennessee One-party Tennessee generally allows participant recording or recording with one person's consent, subject to specific limitations. Tennessee Code portal
    Texas One-party Texas generally allows recording when you're part of the conversation or one participant has consented. Tex. Penal Code § 16.02
    Utah One-party Utah generally allows participant recording or recording with one participant's prior consent. Utah Code portal
    Vermont Federal baseline is particularly important Vermont does not have the same kind of general state wiretap law as many other states, so federal law plays a bigger role. 18 U.S.C. § 2511
    Virginia One-party Virginia generally allows recording when you're part of the conversation or one participant has given prior consent. Va. Code § 19.2-62
    Washington All-party Washington generally requires consent from everyone involved in a private phone call or private conversation, although exceptions exist. RCW 9.73.030
    West Virginia One-party West Virginia generally allows recording when you're part of the conversation or one participant has given prior consent. W. Va. Code § 62-1D-3
    Wisconsin Generally one-party Wisconsin generally allows participant recording, although separate rules may affect how a recording can be used later. Wisconsin Statutes, ch. 968
    Wyoming One-party Wyoming generally allows participant recording or recording with prior consent from one participant. Wyo. Stat. § 7-3-702
    Washington, D.C. One-party Washington, D.C. generally allows recording when you're part of the conversation or one participant has given prior consent. D.C. Code § 23-542

    ‍

    When is it generally legal to record someone?

    Whether it is generally legal to make audio recordings depends on where you are, who is participating, and whether the conversation is private.

    ‍

    1. Recording your own conversations in a one-party state

    If you're part of the conversation in a one-party consent state, you can generally record a conversation without the other person's consent.

    ‍

    That can include recording phone calls, interviews, sales calls, business meetings, and some in-person conversations.

    ‍

    But one-party consent does not let you secretly record other people's private conversations when you're not involved. Only one party needs to consent, but someone still has to.

    ‍

    2. Recording conversations in public

    Recording in a public space is often less restricted because people usually have a lower expectation of privacy.

    ‍

    Still, being in public does not automatically make every conversation fair game. A quiet conversation at a restaurant, for example, may still come with a reasonable expectation of privacy.

    ‍

    3. Recording police and public officials

    Recording police and other public officials carrying out their duties in public can be protected under the First Amendment.

    ‍

    That protection has limits. Recording does not give you the right to interfere with police officers, enter restricted areas, or ignore lawful instructions.

    ‍

    When can recording someone be illegal?

    Even in a one-party state, it may still be illegal to record someone in certain situations.

    ‍

    1. Secretly recording a conversation you're not part of

    If you're not a person involved in the conversation and nobody has agreed to the recording, secretly recording audio may violate federal or state wiretapping laws.

    ‍

    Recording a meeting you're attending is very different from hiding a microphone to record private conversations between other people.

    ‍

    2. Recording in private spaces

    Privacy protections are stronger in private spaces such as bathrooms, changing rooms, hotel rooms, bedrooms, medical offices, or law offices.

    ‍

    States may also have separate rules covering hidden cameras, surveillance, and capturing audio.

    ‍

    3. Recording without everyone's consent in an all-party consent state

    In an all-party consent state, you generally need everyone's consent before recording a covered private conversation.

    ‍

    That can include phone calls, private meetings, and other confidential discussions. Some laws include exceptions for emergencies, threats, or certain crimes.

    ‍

    What happens when you record phone calls across state lines?

    Recording phone calls across state lines can be tricky because more than one state's recording laws may apply. If a caller is in a one-party state but the other participant is in an all-party state, the stricter rule may become relevant.

    ‍

    For businesses, the simpler approach is usually to disclose the recording to everyone on the call.

    ‍

    Is audio recording different from video recording?

    Yes, audio recordings are often covered by wiretapping and eavesdropping laws, while a video recording without sound may fall under privacy, surveillance, or hidden camera laws.

    ‍

    Once video also includes audio, conversation-recording rules may apply too.

    ‍

    How can businesses record meetings more transparently?

    For companies with teams and customers in different locations, checking the minimum legal requirement before every meeting is not very practical.

    ‍

    A better approach is to make recording clear from the start and protect the data once the meeting is over.

    ‍

    MeetGeek can automatically record meetings on Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams, then turn them into searchable transcripts, summaries, decisions, and action items. Using a consistent notification and consent process also makes it easier to handle meetings across one-party, two-party consent, and mixed-consent states.

    ‍

    MeetGeek meeting transcription and notes

    ‍

    MeetGeek is also designed with privacy and security in mind, which is especially important when recordings may contain sensitive business discussions. The platform includes enterprise-grade protections such as:

    • SOC 2, HIPAA, and GDPR compliance
    • Encryption in transit and at rest
    • Regional data hosting options (US and EU)
    • Zero-training data policy, meaning your meeting data is never used to train AI models

    ‍

    That gives businesses a more consistent way to handle both sides of meeting recording: making participants aware that recording is happening and keeping the resulting meeting data protected.

    ‍

    ‍

    How do recording laws work in the European Union?

    EU rules work differently from U.S. one-party and two-party consent laws.

    ‍

    Under GDPR, recordings can contain personal data, so recording, storing, transcribing, or sharing them counts as data processing.

    ‍

    Consent is one possible legal basis, but it is not the only one. Depending on the situation, organizations may also rely on contractual necessity, legal obligations, legitimate interests, or another valid basis.

    ‍

    Individual EU countries can also have their own privacy laws and rules around secretly recording conversations. In countries such as Germany or France, recording a conversation without consent can be treated as a criminal offense under local privacy or communications laws.

    ‍

    For teams working in regulated industries, it is also worth looking at how to record meetings securely in regulated environments, especially when consent, access controls, retention, and data protection requirements all need to be handled consistently.

    ‍

    What does GDPR require when meetings are recorded?

    Organizations need more than a lawful basis. They also need to think about:

    • Why the meeting is being recorded
    • Whether participants were properly informed
    • How long the recording will be kept
    • Who can access it
    • How the data is protected

    ‍

    Participants may also have rights over their personal data, depending on the situation.

    ‍

    What should you do before recording a conversation?

    A few simple habits can make recording much easier to manage:

    1. Check which recording laws apply.
    2. Consider whether there is a reasonable expectation of privacy.
    3. Tell participants when you're recording.
    4. Keep a record of consent when needed, including written consent where appropriate.
    5. Limit who can access recordings and how long they are stored.
    6. Use one clear company policy across teams and locations.

    ‍

    Make the meeting recording clear from the start

    So, is it illegal to record someone without their permission? Sometimes.

    ‍

    In the U.S., federal law sets a one-party baseline, but state laws can impose stricter rules. In the EU, businesses also need to consider privacy, transparency, retention, and data protection requirements.

    ‍

    The simplest approach is to make recording visible and follow a consistent process across every meeting.

    ‍

    That is where MeetGeek can help. It gives teams a structured way to record meetings transparently, notify participants, keep recordings and transcripts in one secure workspace, and turn conversations into summaries, decisions, and action items.

    ‍

    For companies recording meetings across teams, customers, and locations, that makes it much easier to standardize how recordings are handled instead of leaving consent and data management to individual employees.

    ‍

    Try MeetGeek for free and make meeting recordings easier to manage.

    ‍

    ‍

    Frequently asked questions

    1. Can you legally record a phone call without telling the other person?

    In a one-party state, you can often record a call you're participating in without the other person's consent. In an all-party state, everyone covered by the law generally needs to agree.

    ‍

    2. Can someone secretly record you in person?

    Sometimes. In a one-party state, the person recording may be allowed to record a conversation they're participating in. In a two-party state, secretly recording a protected private conversation may be illegal.

    ‍

    3. Is voice recording someone without permission illegal?

    Not always. Federal law and many states allow a voice recording when at least one party consents. Other states require all-party consent.

    ‍

    4. Is it legal to record a conversation in a public place?

    It can be. Recording in public is often legal, but a private conversation may still carry a reasonable expectation of privacy.

    ‍

    5. Can an illegal recording lead to a lawsuit?

    Yes. Depending on the law, an illegal recording can result in criminal penalties, a civil lawsuit, or civil damages.

    ‍

    6. What can I do if someone is recording me without my consent?

    Start by asking the person to stop and, if appropriate, leave the conversation or meeting. Whether the recording is illegal depends on the law where you are, including whether it is a one-party, all-party, or mixed-consent jurisdiction and whether you had a reasonable expectation of privacy.

    ‍

    If you think the recording may violate the law, keep any evidence you have and speak with a qualified lawyer or the relevant authorities. In a workplace, you may also want to report it through your employer’s HR, legal, or compliance process.

    ‍

    Using Google Meet, Zoom, or Microsoft Teams?
    MeetGeek automatically records, transcribes and summarizes your meetings.

    Try MeetGeek for free
    Table with eight columns and ten rows of content, with headers in a purple row at the top and footers in a purple row at the bottom.
    Related Articles
    See alternatives
    Productivity
    Fellow AI Review 2026: Pricing, Limits and Alternatives
    Fellow pairs AI meeting notes with collaborative agendas, but free-plan limits and seat caps shape what it really costs.
    Productivity
    Leexi Review 2026: Pricing, Limits and Alternatives
    Leexi records video, phone and in-person meetings, with data stored in France. The four plans are where it gets complicated.
    Meetings
    Grain AI Review and 6 Best Alternatives
    Explore Grain’s features, pros, cons, pricing, and user reviews, then compare six alternatives for meeting notes and intelligence.
    By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.
    Stay in the Loop
    Get the latest insights on AI-powered meetings, productivity tips, and product updates delivered straight to your inbox.
    Thank you! Your submission has been received!
    Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
    Join 50,000+ teams already subscribed. Unsubscribe anytime.